.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

A Gentler Place

Sunday, March 20, 2005

Ostara

We see the Mother's soft tints
laid lightly on the earth,
though these are but little hints
of the wonders of rebirth.


Ostara


Tonight is the vernal equinox, a balance point between darkness and light, where day and night are equal. For the northern hemisphere it marks the entrance in to spring and summer - where light dominates.

For those that don't know, the equinoxes are the points in the yearly cycle where the sun passes over the equator. As with all solar events it has been celebrated the world over for many thousands of years.

Equinox


In Europe it has always been associated with the goddess of fertility, Eostre or Ostara. This is where we get the word Easter from.

The Christians always aligned their major festivals at times of pagan festivals and merged them so as to get everyne on board. Though for extra significance, they decided that Easter should be on the first Sunday after the first full moon on or after the vernal equinox. To make things extra confusing they assume the vernal equinox is fixed on the 21st March (when in fact, due to the leap year it moves between 20/21), and it's an ecclesiastical full moon ("what's one of them then?", I hear you cry), which is a full moon according to the church's old tables which aren't absolutely accurate. The upshot of this is that Easter is almost as early as it can get this year, which I always notice as I'll have to make Hot Cross Buns on my birthday this year instead of a birthday cake.

Much of what we consider traditional Easter activities come from our pagan heritage, and the festival of Ostara.

The Green Man


Ostara is the festival of fertility for good reason, it is the birth of spring, when all life jumps from the ground, all is more obviously fertile at this point of the year than any other. At the time of the equinox, the young goddess supposedly mates with The Green Man, becoming impregnated with the Son of Light, Mabon(who is born at Yule), and also the autumn harvest - mirroring the reality that what is sown at Ostara (the vernal equinox) is reaped at the time of the harvest moon, Mabon (the autumn equinox, end of September, Michaelmas in the Christian calendar).

Divine Equinox Mating


Probably the major remaining pagan symbol of this festival is that of the Easter Bunny carrying Easter Eggs. This comes from an old legend about Eostre, uniting two major fertility symbols, the March Hare, and the Egg.

The March Hare is a fertility symbol as it is essentially nocturnal most of the year round, only to be seen at night, but at Ostara when it is in season it needs to mate and comes out during the day. Hence the March Hare, only being seen in March when it is fertile. [The March Hare is often referred to as the Mad March Hare, as made famous by Louis Carroll in Alice in Wonderland, as it's out and about in daylight where it is at risk.]

March Hare


As for the egg, well you can't get much closer to a fertility symbol than that.

On to the story...

Eostre was walking one day in Spring, and came across a little bird with an injured wing. Eostre, being a compassionate sort, desperately wanted to heal this young bird. Alas, the wing was too badly damaged to heal completely, and Eostre realised the young bird would never fly again. She wanted to give the bird back its great vigour and mobility, so she thought about it, and turned the bird into a hare!

However, during the transformation the bird, now hare, retained its ability to lay eggs. The hare was so pleased that Eostra had saved it, that it laid a sacred egg in her honour, which it decorated and presented to her as a gift. She was so pleased that she wished all of the world to share in her joy and instructed the rabbit to go out to all delivering these eggs as gifts of life, fertility and love for all.


Eostre's Bunny


Around the world there are many traditions celebrated on this day. In ancient Rome and Greece, young men would pick a lily from the Ostara temples and present it to their love, the equivilent of a diamond ring today, with all the connotations attached. In Mexico (and south-western america, especially Texas) they have the tradition of cascarones - painted eggshells, filled with confetti, lavendar, sage, perfume, which you smash over the heads of loved ones, bringing them love and luck for the season. The Slavic people thought the day was so overbrimming with life that death was subservient to the living at Ostara, and ceremonily cast a figure of death into the river to drown him, throwing in flowers after him and singing him on his way downstream. The Norse, from where I am descended from, celebrated the Virgin Goddess at Ostara. For them it was the most fertile night of the year, and as such it was practically compulsory to mate on Ostara Eve. Bring back Norse religion I say. ;)

Anyhow, on this day of life, light, rebirth and renewal, I hope you will all give a little thought to your life, what it is to be alive and recognise that our greatest purpose is that of carrying on the great cycle.

The exact moment of this year's vernal equinox is today, 20th March 2005, at 12:33 GMT. Same time across the world as it's an exact astronomical event.

Eostre


Look there is a songbird
And over there is a hare
Excitement in our souls so sacred and fare
The signs that are given of a promise fulfilled
The rebirth of all nature
Flowers in the fields

35 Comments:

  • I think my favorite comedian on the planet, Eddie Izzard, summed it up (as only he could) of the bunnies and chocolate eggs of Easter, "Eggs are for fertility, rabbits are for shagging."

    I think I like your explanation much better, though. I had no idea of the other cultural manifestations. You learn something new every day. Thank you.

    By Blogger Grover, at Sunday, March 20, 2005 4:36:00 am  

  • Eddie Izzard is indeed one of the greats. He did a really funny stand-up here for charity this month, something about hunting moths with a flame thrower... LOL

    The first day you learn nothing new, is the day after you died.

    By Blogger Orbling, at Sunday, March 20, 2005 4:40:00 am  

  • I'm worried for you Karl.

    By Blogger Andrew, at Sunday, March 20, 2005 1:45:00 pm  

  • Informative, entertaining post and well worth the wait, as always ...

    What exactly does Andrew worry about? And who is Eddie Izzard - besides a comedian that is?

    By Blogger KC, at Sunday, March 20, 2005 2:16:00 pm  

  • Well as a decent British comedian quoted recently...

    [his motto] "You live and learn, and then die and forget it all."

    That being most definitely the case, I think that knowledge is worthless unless you share it. As I have no offspring, and am, unfortunately, unlikely to ever - I want to pass on some bits and pieces that people don't know. You know the little reasons behind things we've all known all our life, but never got around to finding out.

    Must be the teacher in me, it runs in the blood, always want any readers to pick something up.

    Even if it is just boredom. ;)

    Thank you for the nice comments.

    Spring is indeed a beautiful season, everything is hopeful, everyday there are more flowers, more leaves, more creatures. [The squirrel family in our garden has not long had another litter, so the trees are covered with mini-squirrels.]

    Andrew just thinks I'm lame and boring, and getting worse rapidly. LOL

    Eddie Izzard is one of the top British comedians. He used to be well known for being a transvestite, but that's irrelevent to the greatness that is him. Intensely funny, very surreal at times and quite, quite mad. Well worth watching one of his standup shows.

    http://www.eddieizzard.com/

    By Blogger Orbling, at Monday, March 21, 2005 3:37:00 am  

  • Yes, all the hare's springtime mating activities are contrary to it's normal secretive lifestyle, hence the madness.

    As for the story of Eostre and the rabbit, well that is obviously born out of the combined symbols for what is a very very old natural sabbat festival. It would seem odd that it was concocted in the 19th century, though it's a nice way to tie things together. Could well be a much older folk story, not adapted by any scholar till that period.

    The connections between Easter and Ostara I do not accept are recent fabrications - the adoption of the natural sabbats by the Christian church was arranged very early on in order for the religion to insipedly merge into the various pagan followings of Europe.

    The word Easter used to be Èastre, from Eostre, the spring goddess's name, which was from Austron - the saxon word for offspring or dawn. This is from the germanic root austo-, from the indo-european root aus- which means "east" - where the light comes from. Other words descending from that are words like the Latin aurora, and the German (ost), Dutch (oosten), Swedish (öster) and English (east) words for east. Easter in German is Ostern.

    The non-germanic languages (without the goddess Eostre in their past), have their word for Easter deriving from the Jewish festival of Passover. Spanish (Pascua), Greek (Pascha), Norwegian (Paaske) and French (Pâques).

    /me loves etymology.

    By Blogger Orbling, at Monday, March 21, 2005 8:01:00 am  

  • I'll be devoid of chocolate eggs this year, unless I can be bothered to hunt for one I can actually eat. Darn milky annoyance.

    Think Green & Black's is edible. I'll just make my malted chocolate biscuit loaf for Easter Sunday and be done with it.

    By Blogger Orbling, at Monday, March 21, 2005 8:03:00 am  

  • Hmmm ... I have an additional comment to make but I think I will send it to you later in an email. That way I can "razz" you a bit for something you wrote here.

    As for now, I'm running late for work, so you'll have to survive a bit longer without said comment.

    By Blogger KC, at Monday, March 21, 2005 11:12:00 am  

  • Well, the Malted Chocolate Biscuit Loaf is quite yummy, and is non-baked so easy to make (if you can get the ingredients, which are rather UK specific). I'll post the recipe shortly.

    As I post so infrequently, I think I should make an effort when I do - and get carried away. So apologies for length, just think of it as many short posts all at once.

    And there's always space for an ancient Greek reference, so much of the present is due to them.

    By Blogger Orbling, at Tuesday, March 22, 2005 3:39:00 am  

  • Eion prods me for accuracy, as ever. This must come from me prodding him for spellings I forget eight times a day...

    The Indo-European root aus- technically meant "to shine", and from that we got ausos "dawn", which is why we have east as "direction of the sunrise/dawn".

    I mentioned that the Latin word Aurora came from this root, and it does, being the Roman goddess of dawn, another name for Eostre. The Greeks also had this goddess with the same name, Eos.

    At the end I generalised and said that the non-germanic languages used the Passover derivation for Easter because they did not have the goddess. That was not exactly what I meant, as some of them did (Greece being the obvious example), just they didn't keep the connection between the old deity and the Christian festival in their languages.

    Not only do you learn something new everyday, but you'll also have it corrected every other day. ;)

    By Blogger Orbling, at Tuesday, March 22, 2005 4:26:00 am  

  • Thank you for educating me on the history of the Easter Bunny. They didn't teach us that in church. :)
    Every year I look forward to the Easter basket my mom makes for me (yes, I'm 26 years old and still get an Easter basket). She always puts the neatest stuff in it and loads of chocolate. Yummy.
    I hope you have a wonderful Easter, Karl.

    By Blogger Texas Gurl, at Tuesday, March 22, 2005 11:51:00 pm  

  • There are a lot of things not taught in the church...

    I don't think 26 is too old to get an easter basket - I was monumentally annoyed when I stopped getting a stocking not that long ago...

    Happy Easter to you to TG. :)

    By Blogger Orbling, at Wednesday, March 23, 2005 12:24:00 am  

  • I know you're really into animal welfare, as am I, and thought you would be interested in this. Hehe.

    By Blogger Texas Gurl, at Wednesday, March 23, 2005 1:30:00 am  

  • LOL, oh dear...

    I'm not at all in favour of castration and spaying of domestic animals - the right to reproduce is more fundamental to all life than anything else. Robbing them of that natural gift for our own convenience seems hideous in the extreme.

    Though I think that sentences of that ilk, involving the phrase "human intervention" are quite scary.

    "meat flavour"?? You've gotta worry, haven't you. :|

    By Blogger Orbling, at Wednesday, March 23, 2005 2:12:00 am  

  • The dog condom thing is more than a bit strange ... Besides who really has the time to follow their dog around while he sniffs for tail?

    This really can't be serious, can it?

    On the note of spaying and neutering though, I'd rather take an animals ability to reproduce away rather than have more perfectly good animals dropped off at shelters and put down due to lack of space and/or adoption.

    It seems a situation where losing is winning and winning is losing.

    By Blogger KC, at Wednesday, March 23, 2005 10:04:00 pm  

  • Hitler got a lot from the US, and no doubt from us too. An odd man he was, I feel sorry for Nietzsche...

    The idea of castrating the poor is much the same as for castrating animals - preventing problematic births that will need looking after later.

    As with most things with animals (ie. euthanasia) we consider it in their best interests to take these measures, but with humans it's considered morally bankrupt. Hmm.

    I'm sure it's a joke Stacey. Can't think anyone in their right mind is going to be putting one of those on their doggies... :S

    The situation is certainly a pickle, one of the moral problems associated with domesticating animals. Damned if we do, damned if we don't.

    By Blogger Orbling, at Thursday, March 24, 2005 1:48:00 am  

  • Count me as relieved ... The mental picture I was getting was quite ridiculous ...

    So much for hiding the fact that I am a known gullible ...

    By Blogger KC, at Thursday, March 24, 2005 3:03:00 am  

  • I prefer to call that characteristic "trusting" - something I have in abundance too. ;)

    Mental images of that don't bare thinking about. Bad enough with humans, LOL.

    By Blogger Orbling, at Thursday, March 24, 2005 3:09:00 am  

  • Did I say I disagreed with that position. The voluntary euthansia argument is sound in my opinion, I know that I'd want people to let me go if I were a vegetable.

    A slight hassle with the animal side of that equation is that some animals are put-down because the treatment for whatever they have is too expensive to bother with. Not sure how I feel about that.

    By Blogger Orbling, at Thursday, March 24, 2005 3:38:00 am  

  • Agreed.

    Though if it's a case of a "fix" being available (as opposed to a time extension), but they can't afford to pay - I think some financial source should step in.

    Dogs and cats are held in such regard in this country that I think the government could get away with extending the NHS to pets...

    By Blogger Orbling, at Thursday, March 24, 2005 4:14:00 am  

  • I think cost of treatment is what really needs to be re-evaluated. In this day and age of responsible pet ownership, just taking your pets in for a check up can break the bank.

    I should know. I just shelled out close to a hundred dollars to take my two cats for a vet check up that may have lasted twenty minutes tops.

    Money ruins everything ... Greed is contagious.

    By Blogger KC, at Thursday, March 24, 2005 4:17:00 am  

  • "Money ruins everything"

    Never a truer word spoken.

    Pets are pricey. They give a good return on the investment though.

    I don't think Eion, that we need pull the readers in to our long running "disagreement" on fiscal policy. ;)

    But yes, if you have pets, you should be able to afford them.

    By Blogger Orbling, at Thursday, March 24, 2005 4:24:00 am  

  • "people who choose not to keep animals [or whatever] are subsidising those who do"

    Such is the purpose of a society. We all look after each other, and each others pets, as necessary.

    And yes, that consequence would be annoying. Though that might have the effect of expanding the base of people who have practice caring for things other than themselves - which could bring a net improvement to the world.

    By Blogger Orbling, at Thursday, March 24, 2005 4:45:00 am  

  • Well I say tomato, and you say corporately influenced anarchy...

    Government can have many purposes.

    But yes, the meat subsidies (and infact the majority of the EU CAP agreement) do make me want to write to my agricultural minister. Again.

    Anyhow, we best drop this - this post was long enough without the comments - it's flipping gigantic now. LOL

    By Blogger Orbling, at Thursday, March 24, 2005 5:08:00 am  

  • Not quite the last word as I have dibs on comment #41 ... What I was trying to say about re-evaluating the health care expense of animals is to take a realistic look at how much doctors are allowed to charge for their services as well as the cost of prescribed medicinal treatments.

    I think we all know that we're paying much more than necessary for services rendered. Take for instance, a trip to the hospital ... I don't know how it's possible but there have been itemized bills proving that people have paid more than five dollars alone for a single bandaid.

    Are we serious? When did health care get to be about ripping people off any way possible?

    I'm telling you this whole greed thing has nasty repercussions for us all.

    By Blogger KC, at Thursday, March 24, 2005 10:40:00 pm  

  • "I'm telling you this whole greed thing has nasty repercussions for us all."

    Amen to that.

    By Blogger Orbling, at Friday, March 25, 2005 1:37:00 am  

  • Maybe they just needed to use a band-aid in the hospital...

    [Band-aid is a plaster right?]

    Heavy regulation can cause artificial monopolies. I wouldn't mind if they were NFP's...

    By Blogger Orbling, at Friday, March 25, 2005 3:56:00 am  

  • I've an even better idea ... How about we get a percentage of the money we put into our health care programs back if we don't use a certain portion of it at the end of the fiscal year?

    Every week, I have a significant amount extracted from my earnings towards my medical, dental, vision, etc ... Last year, other than the standard checkups for both myself and my daughter, we didn't use even half of what was put away towards our medical expenses.

    So why does the HMO get to keep the funds I've put away for my family's needs and not either refund a portion or carry my contributions over into the new year?

    Our system here in the US is broken and needs to be fixed. Prescription costs are astronomical, doctor visits are unreasonable and that's when you're blessed to carry insurance. Just the thought of not having insurance would scare me half to death.

    I'm not necessarily saying we have to switch over to socialist ways, but there has got to be a better answer for all and not just for some.

    Problem is no one in Washington seems to want to work on it.

    By Blogger KC, at Friday, March 25, 2005 11:09:00 am  

  • Well, the socialist ways do remove these issues, for the most part at least.

    All treatment is free, though we pay prescription charges (about £6.xx ($11) per item) - though you are exempt from charges if you are: under 16 (under 19 if in full-time education), over 60, pregnant, have a child under 1, are on social security (this includes income support*), are disabled, are in hospital, or are a war veteran...

    *income support is extra money given to people on low incomes with a family to support to make up their wage.

    By Blogger Orbling, at Saturday, March 26, 2005 4:04:00 am  

  • The waiting lists are mainly there due to poor implementation of the NHS, it could be run well, with the correct funding and management. Mainly funding.

    As with most socialist policies, they are designed to be for the benefit of the msjority - not the minority wealthy, who don't require all that they have anyhow. :p

    By Blogger Orbling, at Saturday, March 26, 2005 6:09:00 am  

  • "If the wealthy don't require all that they have then why would they work so hard to get more?"

    I ask myself this regularly, the only answer is obviously greed. They just find more to buy, more ways to spend, they don't require the additional money - just desire it.

    By Blogger Orbling, at Sunday, March 27, 2005 6:53:00 am  

  • There will always be people who take advantage of the safety nets, but the nets are not their for them - they are to catch those who, for whatever reason, find themselves unable to keep up with the high fliers.

    Not everyone can earn a lot, for if everyone did, then no one would. "If everyone's special, no one is."

    Just a bit of wealth redistribution, ethical management of the greedy cats. :)

    By Blogger Orbling, at Monday, March 28, 2005 3:42:00 am  

  • Well that argument panders to your support of the 'survival of the fittest' idea.

    Poor (who aren't necessarily lazy, and don't always squander their potential) should die, rich should prosper on their backs. You can only have more than another by depriving them of it - no one needs more than anyone else. So equality should be maintained.

    It's a scandal the inequality has been allowed to grow.

    By Blogger Orbling, at Tuesday, March 29, 2005 4:03:00 am  

  • The trouble comes when you have all the chickens and carrots, and I have Sweet FA.

    This Friedman style economic monetarism is a load of bull.

    By Blogger Orbling, at Tuesday, March 29, 2005 6:24:00 am  

  • Yes well I was more thinking of sh*t, than -ion...

    By Blogger Orbling, at Tuesday, March 29, 2005 8:07:00 am  

Post a Comment

<< Home